Spot the leak.Fix the path.
Most website audits hand you a score. This one shows the actual signals a search engine, a buyer, or a lead path can trip over — then tells you what to fix next.
What gets reviewed
Six lenses. One decision map.
Broad enough to surface useful problems, clear enough to show what still needs deeper browser, analytics, or manual testing.
Search foundations
Can search engines understand the page, choose the right URL, and discover the rest of the site?
Title · description · H1 · canonical · indexability · robots · sitemap · internal links · schema
Lead path
Does a visitor know what to do next, and is there a real path from interest to enquiry?
Primary CTA · contact route · forms · tap-to-call · WhatsApp · next-step clarity
Trust layer
Does the page show enough proof and business context for a new visitor to believe it?
Proof signals · privacy/legal · social profiles · favicon · sharing metadata
Technical setup
Are the public response and baseline security signals clean enough to avoid preventable friction?
HTTPS · status · redirects · HSTS · MIME protection · frame protection
Mobile & access
Does the HTML provide the basic signals a usable mobile and accessible experience needs?
Viewport · document language · image alt coverage · structural signals
Performance readiness
Are there obvious payload and loading hints worth investigating before deeper browser testing?
HTML size · scripts · stylesheets · image loading hints · no fake CWV claims
Why there is no 100 / 100
A score hides the decision.
A missing canonical and a weak CTA should not disappear into the same mystery number. The report keeps severity, evidence, and the next action visible so you can decide what actually matters.
+ priority
+ action
From scan to scope
Use the report.Then act on it.
The scan is useful only if it turns into a clear next move. Start with the biggest blockers, then carry that context into the project scope.
Run the scan
Paste a public URL and build the first-pass diagnostic.
Fix priority first
Handle Critical and High findings before cosmetic improvements.
Carry context forward
Move the reviewed URL and priority findings into the project request.
Already know you want the issues fixed?
Skip the generic enquiry and start with a scoped project request.
FAQ
Before you scan.
01What does the website review check?+
The quick review checks server-delivered HTML and response headers for SEO, content structure, mobile viewport setup, accessibility signals, technical headers, trust signals, conversion paths, robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and lightweight performance indicators.
02Does this tool measure Core Web Vitals?+
Not yet. The first version does not claim to measure LCP, INP, or CLS. Those metrics require browser or field data, so the report clearly separates measured signals from metrics it does not measure.
03Will Social Linker submit forms on my website?+
No. The quick review only reads public resources. It does not submit contact forms, attempt logins, bypass authentication, or scan private network addresses.
04Is the report a replacement for a professional audit?+
No. It is a fast diagnostic designed to reveal useful opportunities before a deeper manual review. Complex SEO, analytics, accessibility, security, and conversion work still benefits from expert investigation.
Keep building the brief